I only discovered this recently, and it’s very handy.

Piping scripts directly to bash is a security risk. You can always download the scripts, inspect them and run locally if you so choose.

  • Saik0
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1110 days ago

    There is no functional difference to piping a script vs running an AUR or other user repository install.

      • Saik0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        710 days ago

        Eh… I have my own repo that pulls the PVE repo and updates a bunch of things to how I want them to be and then runs a local version of the main page. While I don’t stare at every update they make… There’s likely enough of us out there looking at the scripts that we’d sound some alarms if something off was happening.

        • @NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 days ago

          Which puts you ahead of the curve. But you are still depending on enough other people to be watching every update and so forth.

          I am not saying I am much better. But it is one of those things where anyone considering the selfhosted Fun should REALLY spend some time dealing with software supply chains and the like. Too many people just figure “it is open source so it is safe” or, even in this thread, assume something is more or less safe based upon what app pulls it.

          • Saik0
            link
            fedilink
            English
            89 days ago

            Sure, but my point is that it’s no different to an AUR/user repo. At some point you’re just trusting someone else.

            I think the whole “Don’t put bash scripts into a terminal” is too broad. It’s the same risk factor as any blind trust in ANY repository. If you trust the repo then what does it matter if you install the program via repo or bash script. It’s the same. In this specific case though, I trust the repo pretty well. I’ve read well more than half of the lines of code I actually run. When tteck was running it… he was very very sensitive about what was added and I had 100% faith in it. Since the community took it over after his death it seems like we’re still pretty well off… but it’s been growing much faster than I can keep up with.

            But none of these issues are any different than installing from AUR.

            The rule should just be “don’t run shit from untrusted sources” which could include AUR/repo sources.

      • @antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 days ago

        I’m a real beginner with this stuff and I read through the install scripts before running them. But it wasn’t for security, I just wanted to see if I could learn some tips since I had already struggled to do it manually.

          • Lka1988
            link
            fedilink
            English
            49 days ago

            Upgrade what? The LXC/VM you just removed because of a wonky script?

            You went on with this for way too long, my guy. We get it, you don’t like the helper scripts.

            • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              09 days ago

              Upgrade what? The LXC/VM you just removed because of a wonky script?

              Did you purposefully misunderstand me? How did you not know that I meant “how do you update the thing you installed with a rando shell script” and not “how do you update something after removing it”?

          • y0kai [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 days ago

            I’m pretty sure for most of them you just type update and it will update.

      • Saik0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        AUR repo items don’t necessarily clean themselves up properly either. So I’m not sure why you think that’s part of some requirement for the scripts if we’re comparing the 2.

        Edit: But in the case of this specific repo… You delete the lxc or vm that you created.